Examining New Urbanism...Communication

For the purposes of this research endeavor, communication can also be referred to as transportation. Sustainable developments encourage inter-personal communication in the design of the transportation network of the development. This is usually achieved through the promotion of pedestrian movement over the reliance on the private automobile.

In addition to pedestrian movement, various forms of public transportation may be utilized to encourage inter-personal communication within the development. The communication system of a sustainable development embraces the normative qualities of providing a connected and combined system of movement within the boundaries of the development.

The connected and combined communication plan for a development is one of the most important elements that contribute to an increase in social interaction between the users of the development. Through the implementation of a connected pedestrian circulation system, opportunities for greater amounts of inter-personal communication can be achieved. This increase helps to unite the residents of the development while encouraging higher levels of social diversity throughout the community as a whole.

A communication plan that is both connected and combined reduces the amount of land that will be disturbed in the construction of the vehicular-uses system. Coupled with the reduction in land consumption, the combined and connected plan aims to decrease environmental impacts by encouraging pedestrian circulation in favor of automobile use through a clear separation of uses, reducing the travel-time required for each automobile trip by providing a more efficient transportation network and therefore reducing carbon-based emissions and finally by encouraging the interaction between users by providing access to open-spaces as well as naturally preserved areas.

It is through the connected and combined system that a development can achieve a higher level of economic sustainability. The elimination of the costs associated with the construction and maintenance of excessive roadways provides the development with the opportunity to invest the capital required into other aspects of the development such as open-space planning and the construction of civic structures.

Residents also benefit from a combined and connected communication network through a decreased dependence on the private automobile as well as decreased operational expenses associated with private automobile ownership.

I want my children to be able to meet and play and communicate with many other children on their own, not only when they are driven somewhere. I want them to grow up in an environment that is not just a place where people sleep but where people work... and where people enjoy themselves. -Moshe Safdie

Greenwashing and Sprawl...Part One

Sprawl.

Remember sprawl? It seems as if the concept and practice of creating/perpetuating sprawl has fallen from the nation's conscious. Is this an indication that we have successfully lobbied against the agents of sprawl and defeated them through the creation of interconnected, pedestrian-friendly, integrated and environmentally-friendly communities?

I am fairly certain we all know the answer to that question.

Why is it then, that the prototypical form of suburban development, adopted shortly after the end of the World War II, has faded into the back of everyone's mind? The answer is simple; most people consider the economic and environmental impacts of sprawl to be insignificant in their daily lives.

Many Americans, especially in these trying economic times, are thankful to even own their own home and have the ability to make the mortgage payment, provide food for their family and own their own private automobile. As former President George W. Bush once said, "I believe part of a hopeful society is one in which somebody owns something." (Source: Third Presidential Debate, Tempe, Arizona, Oct. 13, 2004)

(Granted, home-ownership is a more sustainable form of housing, but I am not exactly sure that's what Dubya meant. And I understand that he's only been the "former-President" for about 24 hours, but it's been a long 8 years.)

Americans, at least a large portion of Americans, for some reason have yet to associate any intangible (or tangible for that matter) costs with the practice of sprawl. Why is that? The answer is simple; greenwashing.

While the national builders and their associated trade organizations will be the first to tell you that they are concerned with developing "communities" and building homes to address our housing needs, in reality they exist for one reason; to make a profit.

The most profitable way for a national builder to develop a community is to acquire "raw land" which in most cases is located away from city centers. The reason for this is simple, volume + low development cost = enormous profits.

It doesn't take a genius to understand that developing a parcel of land that used to be a farm is far less expensive than rehabilitating or adapting an urban structure for housing. More importantly, these builders are mainly concerned with how many homes they can build in the shortest period of time. (As an example, Pulte's Del Webb division requires a minimum potential of 3,000 units plus adequate acreage for a golf course in order to even consider purchasing a tract of land.)

But this is not the point of our exploration today. Admittedly, the effects of sprawl are widespread, numerous and often exhausting to contemplate; which is probably the major factor which has contributed to why we have seemingly "moved on" from being concerned with sprawl.

To simplify our discussion, we need to understand the hidden or intangible costs of sprawl. The most important of which are the added degradation of our overall health, the added expense associated with our transportation choices and the negative environmental impact that suburban developments in rural areas inflict upon the ecosystem.

Consider our national health.

The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) reports that 12.4% of children age 2-5, 17% of children age 6-11 and 17.6% of children age 12-19 are obese. While the integration of high-fructose corn syrup into nearly every food product in our society has contributed to this alarming trend, the pervasion of suburban sprawl can be considered one of, if not the largest, contributing factor. Why you may ask? One of the Hyper-Capitalist driven strategies for developing profitable communities is to avoid building sidewalks.

Seems like a silly or insignificant element. But take a tour of any of the new developments in your immediate area and pay close attention to the design of many of the homes. You will notice that the most significant element of the facade is the garage. Simply think back to our discussion of our national transportation choices and we understand why the garage has become so significant in the design and construction of new homes.

In addition to our transportation choices, if we look at the national builder strategy of maximizing the number of potential units,we find that neighborhood parks take away the opportunity to build one more unit. Besides, Americans drive everywhere anyway, so there is no need for spaces that cost money to design, build and maintain without the Hyper-Capitalist benefit of profitability.

Our previous discussions of our national transportation choices eludes to the additional costs associated creating developments which are, in essence, disconnected from basic goods and services. In addition to these costs, increased automobile trips cost us something more important than money; time.

The time Americans spend commuting, obtaining goods and services from sources that are agents of sprawl themselves and working to maintain their primary mode of transportation leads to a disconnect with the landscape, the environment as a whole and with other members of our society. Consider this simple fact: Americans spend more time commuting to and from work (around 100 hours) than they do vacationing (around 80 hours). To further compound the issue, the average American forfeits 3 whole days of vacation per year!

The final cost, the added impact to the ecosystem and environment which sprawling developments exert on previously undeveloped land, contributes to a myriad of costs for our society.

The introduction of petroleum-based products into ecosystems that previously protected themselves naturally from a minimum amount of these products and by-products has had a widespread economic impact on our daily lives. Environmental clean-up programs, the degradation of our clean water supplies and the nitrification and destruction of our soils have led to costs that are increasing daily and will have a long-term impact that has yet to be realized.

Perhaps the main reason that the issue of sprawl has fallen to the wayside is that it can be exhausting. Our discussion today has barely scratched the surface of the overall effect that this practice has exerted on our culture and society.

It seems as if this discussion has also strayed from the original topic; greenwashing. Admittedly it has, only in the sense that we have yet to discuss how greenwashing is utilized in the continued pervasion of sprawl.

Considering the somewhat overwhelming evidence that we have presented today, we shall continue our exploration of the use of greenwashing in our next post.

Our settlement of land is without regard to the best use of land. -Arthur Erickson

Back on the Greenwashing Express...

With the hope of a political paradigm shift that should correct many of the mistakes made over the past 8-years on the nation's mind, we will reopen our investigation into the practice of greenwashing.

Since our original discussion, it seems that the nearly every manufacturer, corporation and political candidate has attached themselves to the "green" movement. As our discussion over the next few days should demonstrate, much of what people consider "green" is actually a far cry from where we (as a society and as a culture) should be headed.

Greenwashing is a concept which has already moved past the simple masking of environmentally destructive behavior. Over the next few days, we will explore how greenwashing practices have masked unsustainable and inequitable choices in the following areas:

• Corporate Pollution
• The Pervasion of Sprawl
• The Glorification of Unsustainable Site Planning Practices
• The Masking of Unsustainable and Inequitable Transportation Planning Choices (from a consumer-based and policy standpoint)
• The Pervasion of Consumptionism
• The Degradation of the Design Process
• The Perversion of American Landscape Architectural and Architectural Heritage

Our examination begins with two prominent players from the auto industry bail-out, Ford Motor Company and General Motors.

If you had the opportunity to view the NFL Championship games this past weekend, you may have noticed that nearly every automobile commercial claimed some form of commitment to sustainability. Under the influence of Hyper-Capitalism, the average consumptionist might believe such statements.

Honestly, they wouldn't say something on television that wasn't true, would they?

Let's take a closer look.

Our friends at Ford, specifically Ford's current (and Boeing's former) CEO and President, Alan Mulally, makes the following statement;

Ford is becoming smaller, leaner, more globally integrated and more focused on meeting customers' needs and wants. It is also a company with sustainability at the heart of its business. Our vision for the 21st century is to provide sustainable transportation that is affordable in every sense of the word: socially, environmentally and economically. (Source: Alan R. Mulally President and Chief Executive Officer, 2007/8 Ford Motor Company Sustainability Report.)

Interesting. Especially the portion about environmental sustainability.

However, let us dissect exactly what Alan is referring to when he talks about sustainability. A closer look reveals that he is only referring to "transportation".

But wait, shouldn't that sustainable vision extend to every aspect of providing those transportation choices? (Incidentally, we will examine just exactly how Ford is providing sustainable and equitable transportation choices for our nation in a few days.)

But Alan, why was your company recently named the 17th worst air pollution producer in the U.S.?

Through the mask of greenwashing, we are led to believe the notion that Ford is forging ahead on a truly sustainable path.

Along the same lines, and out of fairness to Ford, General Motors makes the following statements on their corporate website;

The following environmental principles provide guidance to General Motors personnel worldwide in the conduct of their daily business practices.
1. We are committed to actions to restore and preserve the environment.
2. We are committed to reducing waste and pollutants, conserving resources, and recycling materials at every stage of the product life cycle (Source: GM Environmental Principles)

Not to diminish GM's standing in the nation's conscious, but they do not pollute our nation's atmosphere nearly as much as Ford; they are only 18th on the list.

We can clearly see where all of this is heading. Masking the process of creating these allegedly sustainable products helps these entities to continue with their Hyper-Capitalist driven agendas.

To finish our discussion, we will turn (once again) to our favorite home improvement retailer; Lowe's.

We can all recall what our friend's at Lowe's claimed was their commitment to sustainability.

Well, it seems that Lowe's research department needs put in a little overtime.

Lowe's recently named Owens Corning their "Supplier of the Year".

The only problem is that Owens Corning was also recently named the 26th worst air polluter in the United States. Not exactly the most sustainable and equitable choice for a corporation that claims to be "stewards of the environment".

So where does this leave us?

It leaves us exactly where we started, with the desperate need to implement and foster a systematic-wide paradigm shift that sheds the cloak of greenwashing in favor of choices and practices that actually make a difference.

And all of you Hyper-Capitalist supporters need not worry; sustainability, equality, and profits are not mutually exclusive.

As previously mentioned, greenwashing extends beyond the masking of environmental degradation in the form of pollution. As consumers, and more importantly, as members of the wider ecological community, we must be vigilant in examining every practice and ideal which greenwashing helps to mask.

It is only through this vigilance that we will be able to achieve the much-needed systematic paradigm shift that will help ensure our social, cultural and ecological sustainability.

No face which we can give to a matter will stead us so well at last as the truth. This alone wears well. -Henry David Thoreau

Laying the foundations...

Designers, planners, academics and writers are often accused of and fall victim to the phenomenon of analysis paralysis. In short, we continue to collect data on a quest to make the best decision we can regarding an issue; but then we become overwhelmed with data and fail to take action.

As designers, this comes in the form of site analysis. Simply stated, "...the site is analyzed for its fitness for the purpose of the plan..."(Site Planning, Lynch/Hack. 1984.).

In retrospect, our discussion of the auto industry bail-out and our national transportation planning problem has been a broad-stroke, preliminary site analysis. We have identified some core issues, behavioral patterns, social and cultural preferences, environmental impacts and are now prepared to offer a preliminary planning structure that will benefit our nation and our society.

So without heading into a analysis paralysis, let us begin our national recovery.

As we have mentioned, there is a dire need for a systematic paradigm shift with regards to our national transportation planning goals. This will require participation from a variety of stakeholders; resulting in the implementation of a plan which will ensure an equitable and sustainable national transportation strategy. So without further adieu, let us begin.

1. Impose a higher tariff on foreign automotive imports.

Proponents of NAFTA, G8 nations and a host of economists are already beginning to boil-over with reasons we should avoid this avenue. However, if we plan to resuscitate our domestic automotive manufacturing industry, we must give consumers a reason to purchase domestic products. These tariffs not only encourage consumption of domestic products but they will provide a revenue source for our nation that does not come from the pockets of our own citizens.

2. Streamline the domestic manufacturing process.

If we look back to the factors which lead to the creation of the Hyper-Capitalist system, we can argue that its founder was a simple man named Henry Ford. When that name is mentioned, many people conjure images of the now famous "assembly-line process". The Hyper-Capitalist system has distorted the original intention of this process which has lead to a disparity among the compensation workers receive for such work. Consider this fact; an auto worker in the United States averaged a salary equivalent to $70-per-hour while teachers in this nation averaged only $33-per-hour (for a 9-month position). Is manufacturing an automobile truly more challenging and important than educating our nation?

3. Establish more stringent standards for fuel efficiency and tax manufacturers whose products fail to meet or exceed those standards.

The average fuel economy for American autos (2007 model year) is 34-mpg, while the average for Japanese imports is 40.6-mpg. Furthermore, the Chevrolet Aveo tops the list at 37-mpg while the Toyota Prius achieves 51-mpg (both averages shown are for highway miles).

4. Impose regulations which match users with the type and size of vehicle they require as opposed to what their Hyper-Capitalist fueled consumption habits desire.

This will probably be considered the most unattractive element of the plan, but this is essential to the systematic paradigm shift that we must achieve. In simple terms, if you are not employed in the construction trade or don't own a farm, you do not need a truck capable of hauling tons of materials. If you are a homemaker, you do not require a Cadillac Escalade to perform daily short-trips errands. This restriction allows the automotive manufacturers to focus on more fuel efficient autos while also reducing the cost of manufacturing (less steel, etc...); allows designers to destroy less of the landscape to accommodate oversize passenger vehicles and reduces the consumer's expenditures on automobiles.

5. Impose a car-pool tax on single-driver commuters, impose a higher tax on gasoline, offer higher tax credits for the manufacturing of smaller and efficient automobiles and offer tax credits for car-poolers and transit riders.

All of these elements are simple revenue generators that will encourage and facilitate the systematic paradigm shift.

6. Utilize our existing Interstate System for the implementation of alternative forms of viable transit systems; specifically Bus Rapid Transit (BRTs).

Our friends at AASHTO (The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials) have been requiring transportation planners and engineers to design highways with ample amounts of "extra space" (e.g. recovery areas, over sized shoulder widths, wide median widths, etc..). With a retrofit that utilizes these spaces, we can definitely re-design our Interstates to accommodate BRTs. This action will also result in development patterns which encourage and foster more compact, compatible and cohesive designs that can combat the adverse effects of sprawl.

7. Utilize alternative energy uses in the development of BRTs, specifically fuel-cells.

While fuel-cell technology was once a hopeful aspect of passenger automobile development, the amount of cells required to efficiently power passenger cars was found to be unachievable. However, buses are a perfect match for the utilization of fuel-cells and many are currently being developed and deployed in various areas of the nation.

8. Utilize our national rail network for commuter and light-rail systems.

Encouraging automotive manufacturers to explore other technologies (especially trains) is not a unrealistic proposition. (In fact, I must give credit to Car Talk for helping to foster this particular part of the planning strategy). Our friends at Car Talk raise a very valid point, Ford CEO Alan Mulally was once CEO of Boeing!!! So a establishing operations for the development of alternative forms of transportation should not be a stretch for Ford.

What we have outlined here are the basic elements of a national transportation strategy which will foster a systematic paradigm shift towards an equitable and sustainable society. Many of these elements impose taxes on various users, manufacturers and limit the need to create over sized swaths of paved areas throughout our nation.

In the Hyper-Capitalist system, the most effective of way of encouraging a systematic paradigm shift is by relating every aspect of every element to the almighty dollar.

People should think things out fresh and not just accept conventional terms and the conventional way of doing things. -R. Buckminster Fuller

Life is a highway...

So where do all of these fantastical percentages, dollar amounts and dizzying statistics leave us? It leaves us with facts; facts which state that Americans spend more on their automobiles than they do on education. That is worth repeating.

Americans spend more on their automobiles than they do on education.

Consider this the ultimate example of the influence which Hyper-Capitalism holds over our lifestyle choices. Hyper-Capitalist ideals are so ingrained into our culture that it will require nothing short of a nearly complete paradigm shift to address the issues we face as a nation and as a society.

This is not to say there is no hope. Spanning our nation is an obvious yet oft forgotten asset; fixed-rail lines. The United States boasts the largest fixed-rail network in the world. And unlike the expansive, obsolete Eisenhower Interstate System; the fixed-rail network of the United States was built with private funds.

If we examine the long-range transportation plans of a majority of the metropolitan areas of the United States, we find that they are centered upon the interstate, outer-loops, inner-loops, bypasses and on and on and on. Highways, bridges, interchanges and many of the other components of the national highway system are in a state of disrepair. So much so, that the president-elect has planned to focus the $850,000,000,000 stimulus package on the repair of our auto-centric infrastructure.

But consider the environmental, economic and social impact associated with highways, asphalt and automobiles. All three of those elements rely on one common item; oil. Are we starting to see the connection? It seems as if this is not some half-baked conspiracy theory. Oil.

Think back to the bailout of an industry who relies on this non-renewable and limited natural resource. They are moving in an unsustainable direction! Just as a reminder; "the ability of present generations to meet their needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs."

If there is a limited amount of oil, we are spending more on our autos than on educating our children, we continue installing additional lanes of oil-rich asphalt highways, we consume more automobiles than we can drive and nearly 80% of drivers are sitting in traffic alone; our transportation plan seems to be moving in a direction of obsolescence. Perhaps it has already reached that point, but Hyper-Capitalism's influence is preventing many of us from admitting that fact.

So to borrow a phrase from the slayer; "where do we go from here?"

We, as a nation and as a society need to commit to a universal paradigm shift which ensures our survival and the survival of future generations. We must shed the chains of Hyper-Capitalism and begin to explore alternatives to building more highways. This is not as difficult as it sounds, and in fact, many Americans have already begun to make changes that will help to alleviate many of the troubles which our nationals transportation plan causes.

With that in mind, we will begin to explore the alternatives that will help propel our nation to greatness once again.

"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." -Nelson Mandela

Going down the road...

When an aging and nearly defunct industry makes strides for innovation that would have marvelled the world 30-years ago, they use their hyper-capitalist connections to give themselves a proverbial "pat-on-the-back".

The automotive industry has been in possession of the technology to produce fuel efficient products for decades, a fact which is neither a half-baked conspiracy theory or a secret. However, even David Frost would probably not be able to get any auto industry executive, oil industry executive or steel manufacturer to admit to that fact.

Fuel efficiency, innovation in design, durability and efficiency in manufacturing are all factors which lead us to the next portion of our analysis of the national transportation scheme; maintenance and operation of your private automobile.

Let us begin with a number from the previous discussion; 1.75 or the average number of licensed drivers per household in the United States. In the same data set, we find that there are an average of 1.90 automobiles per household; which shows that there are more automobiles than drivers in the U.S..

What this demonstrates is Hyper-Capitalism's deep-seeded influence on our consumption habits. Essentially, there is a surplus of automobiles which are owned by licensed driver but not driven on a regular basis.

If we move on from this point, we are introduced to another overwhelming statistic; in 2006 American drivers logged 2,658,621 highway miles in private passenger cars alone. Keep in mind that this does not include motorcycles or any other form of private transportation.

Passenger cars accounted for more than half of all miles logged on highways in 2006. More than motorcylces, trucks and buses COMBINED. Additionally, American passengers logged a meager 52,154-miles on all forms of public, private or subsidized transit in that same year.

Furthermore, 79% of commuters drive to work alone. A measly 9% of commuters utilized carpooling. Keep these numbers in mind while we continue our exploration.

Getting back to the operational costs of driving a private automobile, we find that in 2004 it cost approximately 56-cents per mile to operate an auto. What this means is that Americans spent a whopping $1,488,827.76 on operational costs for their private autos.(note: in 2004 the number of highway miles for passenger cars was around 27,000-miles more than in 2006)

Looking at similar data we find that the average cost-per-vehicle (while driving 15,000-miles per year, which for most people is far less than the actual miles they log) is around $8,000. Combine that with the 1.90 autos that Americans own and we find that the average American spends approximately $15,430 per year owning and maintaining their autos.

So, in addition to the $167.24 that you have contributed to the automobile manufacturers in the past month, the average American is spend over $15,000 per year simply maintaining and operating their automobiles.

Remember, 79% of commuters drove alone to-and-from their place of employment, while only 4.3% utilized a means of public transportation.

The development of and access to a viable means of public transportation becomes the issue; and leaves with our next challenge in developing, planning and implementing an equitable and sustainable transportation plan for our nation.

“Present highways are to a large extent the three-dimensional representation of existing laws. If more creative highway planning and design concepts are to be realized, they must be preceded by legislation to permit and encourage them.” -Michael Rapuano, unpublished memo

Starting by the numbers...

It is common knowledge that there is a transportation problem in this country. Many Americans experience the short-comings of our system on a daily basis while they battle congestion, pollution and the side effects of sprawl on their journey to work. The automobile industry recently received $19.4 Billion (which is this many zeros: 000,000,000.00) of American Taxpayer money in order to prevent an overhaul and much-needed update of their goals and objectives.

Prior to the proposal of an alternative transportation plan for our nation, I felt it necessary to present the case for why America is poised for a complete systematic overhaul. The best way to achieve an understanding is to provide you with data in a format everyone can comprehend; dollars.

Let us take a quick look at the amount of money that the automobile manufacturers received in their bailout; $19,400,000,000. In 2006 (note: the most recent data available), there were 203,000,000 licensed drivers in the United States out of a total resident population of 299,000,000 persons. If we look at what only the licensed drivers gave, donated, allocated, or loaned (anyway you slice it, they simply asked for a handout), the manufacturer's received $95.57 from every driver in the country.

Doesn't seem like much, but the question I pose to you is that could you and your family use an extra $95.57 this week?

Considering the fact that there are (note: the most recent data available) 1.75 drivers per American household, this translates to a household contribution of $167.24.

Could your family use an extra $167.24 this week?

These contributions that you have made are in addition to the funds that you have already provided to the auto manufacturers by simply purchasing an automobile!!! In 2007, the average American spent 11.2% of their disposable income (many of you may not remember disposable income, just think back to the Clinton Administration) on transportation related expenses.

That same year, the only other expenditures that Americans spent more on were Medical Care, Housing and Food/Tobacco.

$374,400,000,000.

That is how much Americans spent on purchasing cars, trucks and RVs in 2006.

***Time out, you say. Your data sets are from all over the place!?!?! Admittedly this is a side effect of the data available this morning from the various agencies of the United States Government. The most recent, and considerably more accurate data will not be available until September 2009; personally speaking, we cannot wait that long to perform a preliminary analysis.***

Let us take a day to absorb the information which has been presented thus far in our discussion of a sustainable and equitable transportation plan for our struggling nation. Truly, you should be focused upon one number; $167.24.

I encourage you to make a list of what you could do with $167.24 this week.

$167.24.

"Gasoline helps power the American dream, giving us the freedom to travel where we want and when we want -- for work, for school or for recreation. A steady supply of clean-burning gasoline is central to our nation's economy." (Source: www.factsonfuel.org)

For every action...

Just as we have concluded our brief discussion of the influence which hyper-capitalism wields over the comprehensive planning process, we are reminded of the dedication needed to facilitate actual change. Disrupting hyper-capitalist driven federal land auctions has caused a bit of a stir in the profit-driven world, while environmentalists, conservationists, the stewards of the land, the National Geographic Society and Teddy Roosevelt are all applauding one activist's efforts.

The fact that it has taken two-years of litigation between the BLM and various other governmental agencies, environmental protection groups and conservation groups to even hold a federal land and drilling-rights auction, demonstrates the obvious need for a closer look oat our nation's energy consumption and ultimately our overall transportation planning efforts.

We could isolate and analyze these two topics, however that would prove to be counter-productive and violates Barry Commoner's main law of ecology that we have discussed in previous posts; that everything is connected to everything else.

This national dilemma is inclusive of more than the ecological issue; our actions and decisions (which, in this case, seem to be based solely on hyper-capitalist ideals) are most certainly causing long-term, residual effects on what remains of the undeveloped "natural" landscape of the United States.

These actions, which begin with the policy set forth by our elected officials, sets the tone for how our state and local governments (and ultimately us as consumers) plan and develop our nation; which for the past half-century, has been based upon our love of the automobile and our hyper-capitalist driven need to use our automobiles to consume everything from fossil fuels to the aesthetic qualities of our nation's natural beauty.

"We need an energy plan that encourages consumption." -George W. Bush

Complimentary clucking...

What then, is the ultimate goal of comprehensive planning? Especially when it relates to integrating the principles of sustainability within the overall context of the plan?

The creation of a successful comprehensive plan is dependant upon the planning of compact, consolidated, connected and consistent land uses which are arranged (or identified, planned, sited,etc...) throughout the development area (in this case the term development is used to describe the overall evolution and development of a large community, i.e. a town as opposed to a single-family development). There should be a diverse mix of uses throughout the entire planning area, although those uses must be complimentary and consistent.

Nearly all of the modern zoning codes, comprehensive plans and unified development ordinances take into consideration complimentary and consistent land uses designations. The finest example of this segregation of uses is the in almost all municipalities in the United States, land owners are forbidden from siting an adult-oriented business in close proximity to a church or school (which in the case of the church, it is qiute ironic considering the company that Jesus kept, this means you Mary Magdalene!).

When considering the integration of agricultural uses within an urban context in order to promote a self-sustaining community, there is no better example than that of the Garden City. The Garden City concept is a utopian planning ideal created by Ebeneezer Howard in the early nineteenth century, as a response to the negative effects of the Industrial Revolution.

The Garden City concept established a central core to the city, a residential "belt" and an agricultural "belt" on the outmost portion of the city's development area. All of these uses were to be connected through greenbelts (or greenways as they are called today) as well as a light rail system that not only connected points within the city, but it connected graden cities to one another.

Two English cities have been planned according to Howard's vision, Letchworth Garden City and Welwyn Garden City. While planning utopias are exactly that, these two cities have managed to adhere and utilize Howard's original vision for the logical, sustainable and equitable development of urban, suburban and rural areas as one comprehensive whole.

This is the type of approach we, both locally and nationally, should wholly embrace to ensure that the needs of the current generation shall be met without compromising the ability of future generations to meet thier own needs.

“We shall never achieve harmony with land any more than we shall achieve justice or liberty for people. In these higher aspirations the important thing is not to achieve, but to strive.” - Aldo Leopold.

Resolute...

As the calendar year comes to a close, our society prepares for the upcoming challenges (which in reality are no different in 2009 as they were in 2008) by generating lists and "countdowns" to determine how great, or poor, the year has been. That being said, you will find no such lists in this post. Admittedly, the end of 2008 does have some superstitious meaning for the author, however we must keep in mind that only we (as individuals and as communities) control our own destiny, possessing the ability to have a "good year" or "bad year" through the decisions that we make.

If the popular media would focus on the decisions and choices which lead to the most news-worthy events of the past year, we would most certainly grow as individuals, as communities and as a society resulting in a better world for all.

So, nostalgia aside, here is a rough outline of some of the topics that will be discussed here on enVisionGreen over the coming weeks;

• revisiting the concept and practice of greenwashing (featuring our favorite home improvement greenwashers),
• Our American Architectural Heritage (or what would the Romans think of our civic buildings),
• the development and implementation of Big Ideas versus the celebration of details (or what does it all mean versus what makes it so pretty),
• Wii and the destruction of link between you and the outside world (or why go outside for a run when you can stomp around in your living room on a tiny piece of plastic while your family and friends sit on the couch stuffing their faces with high fructose corn syrup based snacks while watching a cartoon version of your human form run around a virtual landscape),
• a closer examination of the bailout of the auto industry and how our government once again missed the boat by helping the hyper-capitalist cause as opposed to grasping an opportunity to make our nation a better place to live and work,
• the case for Cuba (a sustainable paradise versus it's potential destruction by the forces of hyper-capitalism).

Our adventures in the new year will begin with a more detailed exploration of greenwashing, as the notion of "being green" has been used to death over the holiday season to peddle everything from cellular phones to automobiles.

"A typical vice of American politics is the avoidance of saying anything real on real issues." -Theodore Roosevelt

Taking action...

An article in the Washington Post helps to illustrate the need for our diligence and activism. The expansion of highways and interstates has often found its way through wetlands, stream corridors, watersheds and various other ecologically sensitive areas. More often than not, proponents of these transportation projects ususally have a financial interest in the further development of the roadways. Transportation corridors, especially those associated with the Eisenhower Interstate System, have been driven by the hyper-capitalist need to consume more automobiles than necessary. Consider this alarming data gathered from the Bureau of Tansportation Statistics:

In 2007, Americans owned 136,568,083 passenger cars which cost an average of 52.2-cents per mile to operate. That 52.2-cents assumes an average of 15,000-miles per year. If we extrapolate the numbers, that's an annual cost of 1.07-TRILLION dollars spent per year on the cost of operating a passenger car.

Huh, that's quite a bit more than say, $700-Billion. And, as drivers we all know that 15,000-miles per year is unreasonable number in most sprawling areas of the United States.

If we continue to allow hyper-capitalist driven planning decisions to dominate the development of this nation, there are far-reaching consequences that will add to the already dismal state of transportation and development in our nation.